← Search

Robin Shamblen

— year-end
83 matches · 43W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Robin Shamblen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-08-29 · YMCA Swecker · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hannah Schoolfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · YMCA Swecker · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anita Tate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · YMCA Swecker · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Karen Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · YMCA Parker · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-04 · YMCA Parker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morgan Meeks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Annabelle Shrader / Erin Haughey
2026-03-28 · YMCA Parker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morgan Meeks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Candace Smith / Annabelle Shrader
2026-03-15 · YMCA Parker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Ameris Chadband
2026-03-14 · TIC Hinkle-Mabe · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · YMCA Parker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morgan Meeks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-13 · TIC Hinkle-Mabe · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Seidler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-20 · TIC Hinkle-Mabe · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-04-05 · YMCA Parker · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
53.5%
23W–20L · 53.6% of games
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 47.7% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#2 Singles
11%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer