← Search

Jim Kirk

Charleston, WV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 21W–11L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Kirk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2026-05-02 · CTC Goins/Nassif · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Nassif
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-12 · CTC Goins/Nassif · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryce Helmick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-15 · CTC Goins/Nassif · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-20 · CTC Elliot · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Nassif
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-08-13 · CTC Hussell · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laken Ball mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-07-20 · CTC Hussell · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Wilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2025-06-26 · CTC Hussell · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Wilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-05-04 · CTC Helmick/Elliot · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-05 · CTC Helmick/Elliot · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Blackwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-09-29 · CTC Hussell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-11-18 · CTC Blackwell/Brabbin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Brabbin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2023-03-26 · CTC Blackwell/Brabbin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryce Helmick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
62.5%
15W–9L · 56.4% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
7 matches
#1 Singles
16%
5 matches
#2 Singles
13%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe