← Search

Gail Stone

Brooklyn, NY
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 16W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gail Stone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2026-05-19 · Brooklyn: D'Amore/Gryson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pearl Son
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · D'Amore/Gryson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-08 · D'Amore/Gryson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-25 · D'Amore/Wilson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennie KixMiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-12 · D'Amore/Wilson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Florence Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-05-14 · D'Amore/Wilson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-04-15 · Wilson/D'Amore · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Krieger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7
W
2024-03-24 · Wilson/D'Amore · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Sacks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-03-13 · Wilson/D'Amore · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ledra Solomon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-02-04 · Wilson/D'Amore · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Florence Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-21 · Fantera/Brennan-D1 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Hamos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-6
W
2023-06-04 · Bklyn: Fantera/Brennan · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christie Bonilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
41%
16W–23L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 59% of the time
#2 Doubles
59%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams