← Search

Claudia Silberglitt

Burtonsville, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 98W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Claudia Silberglitt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Hannan - Mixed Nuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Silberglitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · Hannan - Mixed Nuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Silberglitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · Hannan - Mixed Nuts · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Silberglitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Reefe - Kit Kats · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melinda Shayuth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-17 · Gesell - Still Smashed 55+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Roselle Baltazar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-13 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharynne Nenon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Peggy Bryan / Douglas Ayers
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Silberglitt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
Lelia Battle / John Smith
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Silberglitt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eva Habash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-4
L
2026-05-17 · Gesell - Still Smashed 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terri Bradford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · Gesell - Still Smashed 55+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen D'Agrosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-03 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justine Handelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.2%
43W–22L · 56.7% of games
3.5
46.7%
21W–24L · 51.5% of games
6.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.8% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 40.7% of games
6.0mixed
62.9%
22W–13L · 54.9% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
40 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova