← Search

Catherine Zeberlein

Highlands Ranch, CO
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
262 matches · 165W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Zeberlein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history262 matches
W
2026-08-30 · LEBTC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Cejka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-0
L
2026-08-27 · LEBTC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Cejka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-20 · LEBTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Cejka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-06 · LEBTC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacie Sonius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-21 · LEBTC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · SS-H ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Giesen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-14 · LEBTC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · SS-H ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · LEBTC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Avery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-02 · SS-H ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacie Sonius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-01 · LEBTC RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carmel Walz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · LEBTC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vickie Conroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.6% of games
3.0
76.8%
106W–32L · 62.7% of games
3.5
34.7%
17W–32L · 44% of games
6.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 60.4% of games
7.0
50%
6W–6L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
110 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
53 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
15 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert