← Search

Brian Steckelberg

Loveland, CO
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 37W–33L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Brian Steckelberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2023-07-30 · LVTA RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dawn Hagen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2023-07-23 · LVTA RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dawn Hagen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
Bobby Diaz / Dan Johnson
2023-07-19 · LVTA PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2023-07-12 · LVTA PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Jeffries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2023-07-09 · LVTA RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dawn Hagen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-07-05 · LVTA PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Jette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
David van Thuyne / Zachary van Thuyne
2023-05-31 · LVTA SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-05-24 · LVTA SILVER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alan Krech
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2023-04-26 · LVTA SILVER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Jette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2022-06-29 · LVTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Less
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-06-22 · LVTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2022-06-15 · LVTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 62.7% of games
4.0
48.4%
15W–16L · 48.7% of games
6.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 77% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#1 Singles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer