← Search

Joe-Anne Saldarini

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 155W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joe-Anne Saldarini to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history219 matches
W
2026-09-14 · TBasinger (CSRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tammy Basinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-11 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Monica Nee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Kendra Treece / Michelle Jeffords
2026-09-10 · ATaylor (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Stricklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-04 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Monica Nee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-02 · TBasinger (CSRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ivy Tedrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-28 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Esther Farnham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-24 · TBasinger (CSRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ashley Barton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · TBasinger (CSRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ivy Tedrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · ATaylor (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Phifer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-17 · TBasinger (CSRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Bowman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · AConger/EFarnham (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christi Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 66.8% of games
4.0
76%
76W–24L · 59.8% of games
4.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.9% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
82.1%
23W–5L · 63.1% of games
8.5
66.7%
28W–14L · 57.8% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
46 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer