← Search

Glory Questad

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 106W–120L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Glory Questad to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history226 matches
L
2026-06-25 · Nice Hits 18+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · Shot Show 18s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karri Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · Shot Show 18s · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · Shot Show 18s · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-28 · Nice Hits 18+ · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · Shot Show 18s · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-18 · Shot Show 18s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Magnuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Nice Hits · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-29 · Nice Hits · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-27 · Nice Hits · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · Shot Show 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Magnuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · Shot Show 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Magnuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.9% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.5%
57W–30L · 55% of games
4.0
23.8%
20W–64L · 40.6% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 53.2% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.6% of games
7.5mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
33 matches
#2 Singles
13%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert