← Search

Julia Clarke

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 60W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julia Clarke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-04-24 · STC-Mitchell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia McKay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · STC-Knox · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassandra Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-27 · STC-Knox · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginger Knox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-01 · STC-Knox · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-26 · STC-Knox · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-20 · STC-Knox · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cassandra Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-13 · STC-Knox · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-09 · STC-Lea · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kira Sorensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-05-01 · STC-Winfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-04-24 · STC-Winfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-11 · STC-Lea · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willemijn de Clercq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-03-01 · STC-Knox · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kanjamat Mullally
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
11W–0L · 69.3% of games
3.5
62%
31W–19L · 56% of games
4.0
24.1%
7W–22L · 43.9% of games
8.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 40.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
23 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer