← Search

Eva Flesher

Superior Township, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 14W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eva Flesher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · CHIP-Roth 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Kate Marshall
2026-07-16 · HV-Dolan 18s 3.0 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Pogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-06 · CHIP-Roth 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · HV-Dolan 18s 3.0 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Thiele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · HV-Dolan 18s 3.0 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · CHIP-Roth 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Najita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Najda Robinsonmayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · CHIP-Roth 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · HV-Dolan 18s 3.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-19 · CHIP-Jang 40s 3.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Najda Robinsonmayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
13.8%
4W–25L · 35.7% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 36.4% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.4% of games
6.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 44.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal