← Search

Helen Lee

MERCER ISLAND, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 45W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Helen Lee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Hancock/Ritchie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · Hancock/Ritchie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · Hancock/Ritchie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · BC-Hancock · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juan Vegarra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · BC-Landry · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-4
L
2026-01-25 · BC-Landry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-10 · BC-Landry · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-23 · Lee · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-3
L
2025-08-17 · Lee · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-10 · Lee/Hancock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-29 · Lee/Hancock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-27 · Lee · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 65.2% of games
3.5
49.3%
33W–34L · 49.8% of games
4.0
13.8%
4W–25L · 35% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 43% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#2 Singles
13%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams