← Search

Hilary Marrow

Rye, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 33W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hilary Marrow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
W
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ghada Jabbour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Cecilia Bermudez / Christine Hikawa
2026-06-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Andrea Vogel / Katie Burns
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Bosacco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ghada Jabbour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-1
W
2026-02-10 · Rye Racquet Love is Nothing · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ghada Jabbour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-01-07 · Rye Racquet Love is Nothing · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ghada Jabbour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-07-10 · Rye Racquet Love is Nothing · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ghada Jabbour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-08 · RRC Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Saya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-26 · Rye Racquet Love is Nothing · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Blanca Sanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-13 · RRC Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-05-06 · RRC Dare Doubles · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Sidari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-04 · RRC Dare Doubles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Hershaft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
58.1%
25W–18L · 53.2% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer