← Search

Tracy Jackson

Troy, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
272 matches · 155W–117L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Tracy Jackson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history272 matches
L
2026-07-24 · TROY-Li 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Olmstead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · DCD- Siersma 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Leff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · DCD- Siersma 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Belleau-Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-08 · TROY-Hill 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nadia Alchy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · DCD- Siersma 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Riya Cao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · TROY-Hill 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Mosher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · BT-Cole 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle O'Neill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · TROY-Li 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Bell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · TROY-Jackson 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Berk-King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · BT-Cole 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Valerie George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · TROY-Jackson 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Cerget
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · BT-Cole 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caren Vondell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 60% of games
2.5
51.1%
24W–23L · 54.6% of games
3.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 54.2% of games
3.5
61.7%
29W–18L · 55.8% of games
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 41.6% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.4% of games
6.0
100%
8W–0L · 78.2% of games
6.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 60.5% of games
7.0
59.3%
16W–11L · 53.5% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 62.5% of games
7.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
99 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
53 matches
#1 Singles
8%
21 matches
#2 Singles
5%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer