← Search

Kimberly Royal

Fort Myers, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 44W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Royal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-09-04 · The Forest - Lowe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · The Forest - Lowe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carla Kellemberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · with Chrissy Rogers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Jennifer Price / Karen Abrams
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Ann Garvey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Chrissy Rogers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Chrissy Rogers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Dayna Webre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Dayna Webre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Michele Rose / Tracy Fang
2026-07-11 · #4 Doubles · with Dayna Webre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Dayna Webre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Cremer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Cremer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 57.3% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe