← Search

Jennifer Lai

MORRISTOWN, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 98W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Lai to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Christine Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Ginny Barnes / Susan Lee
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Vanessa Nied championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Cherie Rygh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Christine Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Helen Liu / Catherine Shaw
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · with Hannah Finkelberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · with Chie Masubuchi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Kong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
Olivia Gallo / Julia Gallo
2026-07-14 · MatchPoint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Nied
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · MatchPoint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toshka Damdin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Geoffrey Jacobson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-03 · Racq Pacq · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Hellmich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-01 · Here Comes Trouble · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Hargens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
82.8%
24W–5L · 65.2% of games
4.0
58.7%
61W–43L · 53.4% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.2% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert