← Search

Sarah Metzinger

— year-end
38 matches · 13W–25L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Sarah Metzinger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2024-07-29 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kirk (CRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Cassetty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-22 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kirk (CRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susie Kirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-24 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kirk (CRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Cassetty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-17 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kirk (CRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Todd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-08-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susie Rosenstihl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-4
L
Chris Helt / Jessica Cole
2023-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
Janet Gutrich / Mary Quinn
2023-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Lozen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-2, 0-1
W
Amy Smithka / Lauren Long
2023-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Alaimo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2023-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Deckard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Mary Quinn / Dawn Zimmerman
2022-08-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greta Cline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2022-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Rasor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Janet Goff / Bettina Jacobs
2022-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Alaimo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.8% of games
3.5
32.1%
9W–19L · 42.1% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert