← Search

Jill DiMassimo

Rye, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 80W–59L · seasons 2017–2026

Captains: add Jill DiMassimo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Saya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
Hallie Nazar de Jaucourt / Jessica Verrochi
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Saya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Saya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lillian Schulz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Saya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Saya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6
L
2026-03-10 · RRC: Glam Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Stempel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-05 · Rye Racquet Love is Nothing · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Noreen Cadigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-24 · Rye Racquet Love is Nothing · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Therese Karl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-22 · RRC: Glam Slammers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Asako Oxendine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-01-20 · Rye Racquet Love is Nothing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Noreen Cadigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
62.6%
72W–43L · 55.1% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.8% of games
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 49% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal