← Search

Nicole Fitzpatrick

— year-end
69 matches · 55W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nicole Fitzpatrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-06-18 · Betty's · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bailey Benham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · Betty's · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Katherine Polk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-07 · OK/Price-Nasr/TRI 3.5-4.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Digney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-07-31 · OK/Price-Nasr/TRI 3.5-4.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Digney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-07-15 · OK/Price-Nasr/TRI 3.5-4.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Digney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-07-10 · OK/Price-Nasr/TRI 3.5-4.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Digney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-06-19 · Betty's · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bailey Benham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-05-22 · Betty's · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Katherine Polk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
Ashley Wise / Stevie Josey
2025-05-08 · Betty's · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bailey Benham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-09-16 · 40 Love · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Orgill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2024-08-20 · OK/Price/Mid-TriW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Digney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2024-08-15 · OK/Price/Mid-TriW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dayton Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 67.4% of games
4.0
82.8%
24W–5L · 64.6% of games
4.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.9% of games
8.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe