← Search

Amanda Nolen

Lagrange, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 11W–14L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Amanda Nolen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Skinner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-25 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · Chata/Pat Majestic · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Knox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-23 · Chata/Kami Adams · #2 Doubles · with Erin Meeks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jennifer Knox / Jessica Livingston
2026-06-02 · Chata/Kami Adams · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Skinner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · Chata/Kami Adams · #2 Doubles · with Heather Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-18 · Chata/Heather Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela McSpadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-13 · Chata/Heather Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela McSpadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · Chata/Susan Rollings · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kami Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-23 · Chata/Heather Graham · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-16 · Chata/Heather Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Skinner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-09-14 · Chata/Heather Graham · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
40%
6W–9L · 46.7% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 34.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer