← Search

Rangsiyakorn Garber

Bloomfield Hills, MI
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
54 matches · 27W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rangsiyakorn Garber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-07-31 · DTC-Parker 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Grady Glowacki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-24 · DTC-Parker 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacob Sa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yumiko Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-17 · DTC-Parker 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Grady Glowacki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nury Steiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-24 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Bartholomew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-11 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Kurec Shahnazary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 39.6% of games
4.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 61.5% of games
4.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.7% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.9% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#1 Singles
28%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert