← Search

Sanjeev Hegde

— year-end
174 matches · 50W–124L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sanjeev Hegde to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
L
2026-06-27 · Princeton Dawgs · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · Princeton Dawgs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashish Mathur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · Princeton Dawgs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parag Katkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · Princeton Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gaurav Kapoor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-30 · Princeton Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edmond Fernandes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · Princeton Dawgs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krishna Varadachari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · Princeton Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edmond Fernandes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · Princeton Dawgs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edmond Fernandes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-31 · princeton dawgs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Viral Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-15 · princeton dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krishna Varadachari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-12-07 · princeton dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelphy Martinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-01 · princeton dawgs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelphy Martinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
46.7%
35W–40L · 47.9% of games
3.5
14.3%
14W–84L · 34.4% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#1 Singles
8%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova