← Search

Stacy Sarner

Los Angeles, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 124W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stacy Sarner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history210 matches
L
2026-08-09 · Wig Snatchers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marguerite Brook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-27 · Kill Shots/Burtis/Balboa · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-0
W
N/A
2026-06-27 · LA - Queen Anne 4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brittany Blackie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · SGV Valley Cats-Johnson-WN/SA8 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · Mixed Troubles · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ryan Shanley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · LA - Queen Anne 4.5W · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · Mixed Troubles · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Todd Nagler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-06 · Kill Shots/Burtis/Balboa · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nilou Panahpour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-05-30 · LA - Queen Anne 4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-17 · Kill Shots/Burtis/Balboa · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexandra Kleinman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · LA - Queen Anne 4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Irene Feher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
Lisa Richardson
2026-05-09 · Kill Shots/Burtis/Balboa · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
77.4%
24W–7L · 61.3% of games
4.0
65.3%
77W–41L · 56.8% of games
4.5
30%
6W–14L · 40.9% of games
8.0
20%
2W–8L · 42.9% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
33 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert