← Search

Deanna DiBiase

MAKAWAO, HI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
329 matches · 184W–145L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deanna DiBiase to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history329 matches
W
2026-09-05 · Mixed Opportunities · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Helman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-30 · Mixed Opportunities · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Wolfe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Tennis Addicts · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Falit mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Tennis Addicts · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Helman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-26 · Making a Racket · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Yeshua Goodman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · Tennis Addicts · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Helman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
Susan Webber / Michelle Smith
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Mona Decrinis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Jill Kanahele championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Jill Kanahele championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Leslie Haughney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Making a Racket · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Hillman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Justin Simpson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
84.2%
64W–12L · 67.2% of games
4.5
11.9%
5W–37L · 33.8% of games
7.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.6% of games
8.0
66%
31W–16L · 58.5% of games
9.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
62.9%
39W–23L · 56.4% of games
9.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 35% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
105 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
99 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
65 matches
#1 Singles
6%
20 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
18 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova