← Search

Katherine Hebert

— year-end
30 matches · 19W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Katherine Hebert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
Meredith Gore / Kim Smith
2026-09-08 · Watters/18/6.5/CWN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Watters/18/6.5/CWN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-25 · Watters/18/6.5/CWN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-18 · Watters/18/6.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Jenny Rodgers / Tracy Jones
2026-07-21 · Watters/18.5/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Watters/18.5/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · Watters/18.5/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · Watters/18.5/2.5-3-3.5/TWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-07 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-03-24 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Rainey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-17 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Rainey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-03 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.3% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 68.1% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 60% of games
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer