← Search

Kathleen Fracasso

— year-end
97 matches · 59W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Fracasso to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-08-12 · HIT, Saliou/Fracasso (D) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlotte Saliou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · King Park, Gillen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan OBrien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · HIT, Saliou/Fracasso (D) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Gillen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · HIT, Schuman/Miller · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · King Park, Gillen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evelyn Wilkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · King Park, Gillen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Ritcey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · HIT, Schuman/Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Reim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · King Park, Gillen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan OBrien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-17 · King Park, Gillen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Saliou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · HIT, Schuman/Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Saliou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-01 · King Park, Gillen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Saliou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-27 · HIT, Saliou/Fracasso (D) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlotte Saliou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
75.9%
22W–7L · 59.6% of games
3.5
52.5%
31W–28L · 48.8% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams