← Search

Emma Sachs

Biddeford, ME
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 36W–21L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emma Sachs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-06-10 · Apex:SorryNotSorry:Colpitts · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-17 · Apex:SorryNotSorry:Colpitts · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-10 · Apex:SorryNotSorry:Colpitts · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandria Kempf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · Apex:SorryNotSorry:Colpitts · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-11 · Apex:SorryNotSorry:Colpitts · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandria Kempf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-14 · Apex:SixPacks:Chadbourne · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Sachs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-01 · Apex:SixPacks:Chadbourne · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Sachs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · Apex:SixPacks:Chadbourne · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Sachs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-01-18 · Apex:SixPacks:Chadbourne · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Sachs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-03 · Apex:SixPacks:Chadbourne · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Sachs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-05-04 · FF:SorryNotSorry:Mao · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2023-05-21 · FF:SorryNotSorry:Gilman · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 67.2% of games
4.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.5% of games
8.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Singles
18%
10 matches
#2 Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova