← Search

Britta Petersson

Richmond, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 19W–18L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Britta Petersson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-09-02 · WW/ Gilman & Harper · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carin Krawitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-26 · WW/ Gilman & Harper · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-19 · WW/ Gilman & Harper · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · WW/ Gilman & Harper · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-5
W
2026-07-29 · WW/ Gilman & Harper · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · 19 Westwood Farney/VanTuyle · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Singleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Ringberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-29 · 19 Westwood Farney/VanTuyle · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Ringberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-6
L
2026-04-25 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carin Krawitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Ringberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Kathy Harcum / Jennifer Morgan
2026-04-12 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rose Yuen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
13W–13L · 50.9% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 51.1% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#1 Singles
19%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams