← Search

Kyle Fout

— year-end
34 matches · 23W–11L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kyle Fout to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2025-12-14 · New Gen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jamie Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-02 · New Gen · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Stefan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · New Gen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jack Schadek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
John Turner / Nicholas Mastruserio
2022-12-18 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Fout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2022-12-04 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Mable
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
David Clark / Surendran Manoharan
2022-11-06 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Fout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Michael Jones / Joe Flynn
2022-10-02 · Scarborough 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Fout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2022-09-25 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Fout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-15 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2022-05-01 · Scarborough 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Fout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Joshua Hafer / Jeff Carter
2022-01-16 · Scarborough · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Spiker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2021-12-12 · Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James MacKey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
70%
21W–9L · 56.9% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova