← Search

Edis Krnjic

Dalton, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 63W–19L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Edis Krnjic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-07-20 · Krnjic · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cole Calbaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · Wolfe/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Ketcham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Krnjic · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jordan Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · Michaelis/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Ketcham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · Wolfe/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Zipfel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · Krnjic · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cole Calbaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dinesh Kovuri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · Michaelis/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · NOGTA/Laura Ketcham · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Zipfel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
Vikas Shah / Alex Walton
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Balamurugan Karthikeyan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-17 · NOGTA/Laura Ketcham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Ketcham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-27 · NOGTA/Caitlin Michaelis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams95 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 63.9% of games
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 56.6% of games
4.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 55% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.3% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 58.4% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer