← Search

Lauren Siegel

— year-end
133 matches · 66W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lauren Siegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Blue Point, Cifelli · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Cifelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7
L
2026-07-07 · King Park, Gillen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · King Park, Gillen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · King Park, Gillen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Scheinman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · King Park, Gillen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Scheinman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · HIT, Schuman/Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Scheinman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · King Park, Gillen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Scheinman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · King Park, Gillen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan OBrien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · HIT, Schuman/Miller · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-08 · King Park, Gillen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Shield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · Blue Point, Cifelli · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Mischo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-6
L
2026-06-02 · HIT, Schuman/Miller · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 56.6% of games
3.5
43.1%
31W–41L · 49.8% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 44% of the time
#1 Singles
44%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#2 Singles
14%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert