← Search

Mike Hill Jr

Bowie, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 67W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mike Hill Jr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
W
2026-08-02 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kasey Kinney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-2
L
2026-08-02 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Ohmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anand Rajeswaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-5
L
2026-07-26 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anand Rajeswaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-5
W
N/A
2026-07-26 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anand Rajeswaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Jonathan Kim / Brandon Kondis
2026-07-25 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Ohmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Brandon Kondis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
Michael Sloan / Jay Anzures
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Senthil Kumar Seetharaman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Senthil Kumar Seetharaman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · Smooth Strokes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Holubecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · Smooth Strokes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jalen Best
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Calem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 70% of games
4.0
47.6%
20W–22L · 54.6% of games
7.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.6% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova