← Search

Vangie Wolford

— year-end
189 matches · 117W–72L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Vangie Wolford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history189 matches
L
2026-09-11 · 4.0 KIW2 Shark Mode X18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Emett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
Sarah Johnson / Jenny Wright
2026-08-28 · 4.0 MTC1 Nelson W18Fam · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aditi Jhalani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Madrid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-03 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hirotomo Nakazawa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-31 · 4.0 MTC Keller W18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabrielle Blawn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-27 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Emett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-10 · 4.0 MTC Keller W18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Su Su Win Thu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-24 · 4.0 MTC Keller W18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Riehm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-02-20 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Emett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-17 · 4.0 MTC Keller W18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Su Su Win Thu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-02-13 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Emett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-11 · 4.0 ??? Nelson W40S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Riehm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
87.5%
28W–4L · 62.5% of games
4.0
58.3%
35W–25L · 53.8% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 48% of games
6.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 76.6% of games
7.0mixed
65.7%
23W–12L · 54.9% of games
7.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 62.2% of games
8.0mixed
34.5%
10W–19L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
58 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer