← Search

Linda Nielander

Evergreen, CO
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
145 matches · 46W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Nielander to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
L
2026-08-24 · HIW GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Curtiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · HIW GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Curley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-03 · HIW GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Curtiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-20 · HIW GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharlene Funk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-13 · HIW TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Curley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · HIW TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Curley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · HIW TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · HIW TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Curley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · HIW TEAL · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Withington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · HIW TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-25 · MC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jody Barbour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-08-18 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anya Civitella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
29.1%
32W–78L · 39.8% of games
6.0
40%
6W–9L · 48.6% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
18 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer