← Search

Janet Nauman

Minneapolis, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 12W–38L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Janet Nauman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-07-02 · Kelly/Stromgren Summer · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Buenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · Kelly/Stromgren Summer · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Stanfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Kelly/Stromgren Summer · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · Kelly/Stromgren Summer · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Buenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · Kelly/Stromgren Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · ICT Williamson 1:00pm · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Jungquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-16 · ICT Hanson 1:30pm · #5 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-27 · ICT Williamson 1:00pm · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Koenig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-23 · ICT Hanson 1:30pm · #6 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-4
L
Genevieve Swanson / Babara Lowe
2026-02-20 · ICT Williamson 1:00pm · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Jungquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-19 · ICT Buchmeier 10:30am · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brigitte Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-09 · ICT Hanson 1:30pm · #6 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 45.5% of games
4.0
8.7%
2W–21L · 35.3% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#6 Singles
12%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe