← Search

Adriana Jones

FORT COLLINS, CO
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 143W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adriana Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
W
2026-08-09 · MLF BLUE · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Michael Boyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · MLF BLUE · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Zachary Bekkedahl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · MLF BLUE · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Michael Boyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · MLF BLUE · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Adeline Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-20 · MLF BLUE · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kim van Ginkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · MLF RED · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Rivoire mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-2
W
2026-05-15 · MLF BLUE · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kim van Ginkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · MLF BLUE · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-10 · MLF RED · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Rivoire mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-02 · MLF BLUE · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Susanna Styve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-15 · MLF BLUE · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kim van Ginkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · MLF RED · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Rivoire mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
8W–0L · 75.4% of games
4.5
92.6%
25W–2L · 71.2% of games
5.0
50%
3W–3L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
94.7%
18W–1L · 69.8% of games
8.5mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 63.3% of games
9.0mixed
97.1%
34W–1L · 66.7% of games
9.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
26 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer