← Search

Karen Harlow

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 81W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Harlow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-08-08 · WHRC-Lipke · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Lipke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-31 · WHRC-Lipke · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Lipke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · WHRC-Lipke · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Lipke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Rivares
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Kim-Geib
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-23 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Dusicka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-03 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Docktor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · WHRC-Webb · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Docktor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · WHRC-Webb · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-20 · WHRC-Saxena · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-14 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Docktor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 58.1% of games
3.5
66.7%
48W–24L · 54.1% of games
4.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 41.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
45 matches
#1 Singles
27%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
21 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova