← Search

Amy MacKay

Traverse City, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 10W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amy MacKay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Team Kaufman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phoebe Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-28 · Team Kaufman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phoebe Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Megan Miller
2026-05-17 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Hilary Gessner
2026-05-17 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Megan Miller
2026-04-26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Gamborino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-01-11 · Team Hodge · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-10 · Team Hodge · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Germaine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-05-17 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 57.7% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.8% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#2 Singles
17%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match
#2 Doubles
4%
1 match
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer