← Search

Joe Andersen

Pocatello, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
485 matches · 235W–250L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joe Andersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history485 matches
W
2026-09-10 · All My Friends · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lyn McArthur mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-03 · All My Friends · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Surmelis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-01 · All My Friends · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-29 · Mixed Mayhem* · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Farnsworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · All My Friends · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Surmelis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Baked PotAces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rigby Swenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-10 · Baked PotAces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keth Galloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-08-06 · Baked PotAces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keth Galloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-08-04 · Shawn Oram · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-30 · Shawn Oram · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Habashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-30 · Baked PotAces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keth Galloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · Baked PotAces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alin Suru
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
58.1%
50W–36L · 54.9% of games
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
42.6%
46W–62L · 49.1% of games
4.0
33.9%
20W–39L · 42.9% of games
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 61.2% of games
7.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 54.2% of games
0.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 54.9% of games
6.5mixed
61.5%
24W–15L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
48W–40L · 50.1% of games
7.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 30.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
147 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
128 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
108 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
87 matches
#2 Singles
3%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert