← Search

Desi Seck

Camden, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 32W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Desi Seck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-06-20 · QU33NS of the Court · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · QU33NS of the Court · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-16 · QU33NS of the Court · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ebony Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · QU33NS of the Court · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-24 · Slice, Slice Baby · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Larry Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-17 · Slice, Slice Baby · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Steinberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-16 · KOAces · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Pagano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-12-21 · The 3.5 Amigos · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nuala Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2025-11-16 · The 3.5 Amigos · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ebony Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-11-09 · The 3.5 Amigos · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ebony Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Constance Foreman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-4
W
2025-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Constance Foreman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 60.1% of games
3.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.7% of games
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams