← Search

Davis Steadman

Lawrence, KS
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 38W–18L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Davis Steadman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Knoflicek, Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Xiao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-09-02 · Stroede, John · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Billy Rippe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Stroede, John · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Billy Rippe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · Stroede, John · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Jay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
L
2026-06-09 · Howes, Eric · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trey Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · Howes, Eric · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trey Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-26 · Howes, Eric · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trey Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · Howes, Eric · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trey Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Howes, Eric · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trey Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-28 · Howes, Eric · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trey Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · Howes, Eric · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carson Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-14 · Howes, Eric · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trey Melvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
76%
19W–6L · 59.1% of games
4.5
60%
9W–6L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.6% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King