← Search

Michele Perry

— year-end
64 matches · 29W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Michele Perry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Cloar/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mystie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Ann Rowell / Lisa Chang
2026-08-19 · Oulette/Sherwood/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · Oulette/Sherwood/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lissa Symancyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Kohler/Liaw/NLR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-4
L
2026-04-26 · Mabry/LR/LRAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-12 · Kohler/Liaw/NLR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · Mabry/LR/LRAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-21 · Mabry/LR/LRAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Mabry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-16 · Kohler/Liaw/NLR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-14 · Kohler/Liaw/NLR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Mabry/LR/LRAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-04 · Kohler/Liaw/NLR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
38.1%
16W–26L · 42.8% of games
6.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 58% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer