← Search

Ami Chesney

Austin, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 16W–31L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Ami Chesney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2025-10-09 · Init2WINit · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Archer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-18 · Init2WINit · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Archer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-09-11 · Init2WINit · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Judy Granger / Leslie Weinrich
2025-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisangela Batista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-24 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-02-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaori Hornbaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Bernal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Carol Meriwether / Betty Davis
2024-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martha Woolverton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
34.8%
16W–30L · 44% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer