← Search

Mary Anne Bullock

— year-end
32 matches · 17W–15L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Mary Anne Bullock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-09-02 · SLind (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Madison Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-01 · DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Anje Seufert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Anna Leigh Marquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-18 · DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katherine Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-12 · SLind (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Dodds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · SAndrews/JSmith (Raintree) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelley Baughman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-03-24 · SAndrews/JSmith (Raintree) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Klingman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-02 · MABullock (Raintree) · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-01 · MABullock (Raintree) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-06-26 · KAllen (Raintree) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Marie Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-20 · CMcKiernan (Raintree) · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Erica Testerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-17 · MABullock (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.8% of games
3.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 51.9% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 50.5% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova