Brant Christensen
Elkhorn, WI
57 matches · 36W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Brant Christensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history57 matches
W
Nathaniel Marshall / Matthew Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Jack Lyons / Steve Lyons - *
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Daniel Henkel / Jacob Stinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
64.4%
29W–16L · 56.1% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
21 matches
#2 Singles
11%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.