← Search

Miguel Mendoza

— year-end
51 matches · 23W–28L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Miguel Mendoza to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-07-06 · McKeon - Sons of Forest Hills · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Walid Bannoura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · McKeon - Sons of Forest Hills · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frederick Duque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · McKeon - Sons of Forest Hills · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Hannan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · McKeon - Defenders · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Soriano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Seung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · McKeon - Sons of Forest Hills · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frederick Duque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · McKeon - Defenders · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Hannan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-29 · McKeon - Sons of Forest Hills · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frederick Duque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · McKeon - Defenders · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Leveque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Juan Rivas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-13 · McKeon - Sons of Forest Hills · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Hannan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-11 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Juan Rivas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 40.8% of games
3.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 39% of games
6.0
75%
15W–5L · 59.9% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert