← Search

Kim Peck

— year-end
38 matches · 10W–28L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Kim Peck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-09-11 · SOAKS BOYD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Lauterbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-03 · SOAKS BOYD · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gracie Santana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · SOAKS BOYD · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · SOAKS BILLINGS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Brandle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · SOAKS BILLINGS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Wayland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · SOAKS BOYD · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gracie Santana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · SOAKS DAVIS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Schrengohst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · SOAKS BOYD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Abraham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-04 · SOAKS DAVIS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Early
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · SOAKS DAVIS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Early
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-02-21 · SOAKS DAVIS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Schrengohst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-20 · SOAKS BOYD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Abraham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 51.1% of games
3.5
0%
0W–10L · 35.4% of games
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova