← Search

Colleen Moar

Alpharetta, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 38W–28L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Colleen Moar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mali Hu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Prema Jayaraman
2026-07-05 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
Liz Riffert
2026-06-24 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 6-7
W
Jennifer Bishop / Elaine Mitchell
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeannine Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 6-2
W
Ryan Johnson / Jennifer Dimenna
2026-01-17 · The Manor (Amy Amick)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stefanie McElheny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-12-13 · The Manor (Amy Amick)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Amick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-29 · The Manor (Amy Amick)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber Hodgkiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-13 · The Manor (Amy Amick)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ileana Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-01 · The Manor (Amy Amick)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stefanie McElheny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-03-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irina Muskovitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 6-7
L
2025-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.1% of games
3.5
53.8%
28W–24L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
26 matches
#2 Singles
18%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert