← Search

Ana Tirado

Coral Gables, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 76W–88L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Ana Tirado to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Beauvois (Salvadore Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Bruce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-15 · Tirado (Biltmore) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Nunes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-04 · Tirado (Salvadore Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elise Benkard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-01 · Tirado (Biltmore) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elise Benkard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-27 · Tirado (Salvadore Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elise Benkard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-17 · Tirado (Biltmore) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Nunes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-18 · Beauvois (Salvadore Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-06 · Tirado (Biltmore) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-05 · Salvadore Park (Pino) · #4 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Eulalia Salas-Egoavil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-04 · Beauvois (Salvadore Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-27 · Tirado (Biltmore) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Nunes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-26 · Tirado (Biltmore) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Nunes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 60.1% of games
3.5
42.4%
50W–68L · 46.9% of games
4.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.6% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
8 matches
#2 Female Doubles
5%
8 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams