← Search

Tommy VanDaniker

— year-end
61 matches · 40W–21L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tommy VanDaniker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-09-12 · McMahon - Sandbaggers Society · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danny Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · McMahon - Sandbaggers Society · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danny Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · McMahon - Sandbaggers Society · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Nohe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-08 · PACC - Long · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-19 · Van Daniker - Nothing but Love · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Nyman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-18 · PACC - Long · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · Van Daniker - Nothing but Love · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Courtney Violette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-04 · PACC - Long · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · PACC - Long · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · Van Daniker - Nothing but Love · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Nyman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-13 · PACC - Long · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Rawls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-31 · Van Daniker - Nothing but Love · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Nyman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
78.9%
15W–4L · 55.4% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.4% of games
7.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.1% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams