Michelle Fine
162 matches · 81W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Michelle Fine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history162 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
CP Honey Deucers:Fine
CP:Ball Busters:Fine
CP:Over the Net:Abbazia/Kornstein
CP:Tennis Junkies:Neyer/Otis
SOL:Fine Wine:Woolwine/Fine
CP: Over the Net and Fabulous 55+:Abbazia/Hager
CP:Ball Busters Spring:Fine
CP:Double Trouble:Fine
CP:Double Trouble:Fine/Bria
CP:High Fives:Fine
CP:Mixed 55 Team
CP:Nat'l Ball Busters:Fine
CP:Over Served:Brown/Masters
CP:Tennis Junkies:Neyer/Otis
HOLD Folder Fall 2025
NEW: You Got Served: Kaplan
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
47.5%
38W–42L · 50.8% of games
3.5
29.4%
10W–24L · 42% of games
6.0
90%
9W–1L · 68.8% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.6% of games
6.0mixed
69%
20W–9L · 60.8% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
48 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.